THE COMPLAINT, FILED ON OCTOBER 13, 1993, PURSUANT TO SECTIO N 113 OF THE CAA, ALLEGED THAT ALL SEANS AND PURDUE UNIVERSI TY VIOLATED THE CAA IN THE RESPONDENT'S FAILED TO CONDUCT A THOROUGH INSPECTION; FAILED TO NOTIFY ON TIME; FAILED TO ADE QUATELY WET THE REGULATED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL ( RAC M) PRIOR TO REMOVAL; FAILED TO STRIP OR CONTAIN RACM; FAILED TO KEEP RACM WET WHILE AWAITING DISPOSAL; AND FAILED TO HAVE AN ON-SITE TRAINEE AND CREDENTIALS AT THE RENOVATION SITE, A LL IN VIOLATION OF THE ASBESTOS NESHAP.