← EPA enforcement cases

TUNDRA ENERGY - STAPLETON TANK BATTERY

Administrative - Formal · FY1999 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 39539

$1K
Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
06-1999-0875
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

1. SECTION 311(B)(6)(B)(I) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTION 1321(B)(6)(B)(I), AS AMENDED BY THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990. 2. TUNDRA ENERGY FACILITY: STAPLETON TANK BATTERY SECTION 28, T8 N, R3 E, SOUTH JENA FIELD JENA, LA SALLE PARISH, LOUISIANA 71342 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 311 OF THE CWA BY: 1) NO EVIDENCE OF THREE YEAR REVIEW OF PLAN BY OWNER/OP- ERATOR; 2) INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY 40 CFR PART 112 ARE NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH WRITTEN PROCEDURES DEVELOPED FOR THE FACILITY; 3) WRITTEN PROCEDURES AND A RECORD OF IN- SPECTIONS ARE NOT SIGNED BY FACILITY SUPERVISOR; 4) WRIT- TEN PROCEDURES AND A RECORD OF INSPECTIONS ARE NOT MADE PART OF THE PLAN; 5) WRITTEN PROCEDURES AND A RECORD OF INSPECTIONS AND A RECORD OF INSPECTIONS ARE NOT MAINTAIN- ED FOR THREE YEARS; 6) PLAN HAS INADEQUATE OR NO DISCUSS- ION OF PERSONNEL AND SPILL PREVENTION PROCEDURES; 7) AC- CUMULATED OIL IN THE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEM(S) IS NOT PICKED UP AND RETURNED TO STORAGE OR PROPERLY DIS- POSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS; 8) SECONDARY CONTAINMENT APPEARS TO BE GROSSLY INADEQUATE FOR TANKS AND CENTRAL TREATING INSTALLATIONS; 9) ABOVE GROUND VALVES AND PIPELINES ARE NOT EXAMINED PERIODICALLY ON A SCHEDULED BASIS FOR GENERAL CONDI

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown