← EPA enforcement cases

HIGHFILL OIL, AN OKLAHOMA FIRM

Administrative - Formal · FY2000 · — · Final Order With Penalty · 40721

$3K
Penalty
Cost recovery
Compliance action

Case

Case Number
06-2000-1107
Type
Administrative - Formal
Lead
EPA
Outcome
Final Order With Penalty
Multimedia
N
Self-disclosure
N

Defendants (1)

Summary

1. SECTIONS 311(B)(6)(A)(II) AND 311(B)(6(B)(I) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT ( CWA ), 33 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1321(B)(6)(A)(II) AND 1321(B)(6)(B)(I), AS AMENDED BY THE OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990. 2. HIGHFILL OIL, AN OKLAHOMA COMPANY FACILITY: JANE RILEY LEASE SECTION 4, T24 N, R17 E CLAREMORE, ROGERS COUNTY, OKLAHOMA 74017 3. RESPONDENT WAS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 311(J) OF THE CWA BY: A) SPCC PLAN HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED AND CERTIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER; B) SPCC PLAN HAS NOT BEEN RE- VIEWED BY THE OWNER/OPERATOR FOR AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 3 YEARS; C) SPCC PLAN HAS NO EVIDENCE OF MANAGEMENT APPROV- AL; D) FIELD DRAINAGE DITCHES, ROAD DITCHES, AND OIL TRAPS, SUMPS OR SKIMMERS ARE NOT REGULARLY INSPECTED FOR ACCUMULATED OIL NOR THE LEAKED OIL IS BEING REMOVED FROM THE GROUND; E) FACILITY HAD NO SECONDARY MEANS OF CON- TAINMENT; F) EVIDENCE OF HEAVY CORROSION AND LEAKING LINES INDICATING THAT THE FACILITY HAS AN INADEQUATE FLOWLINE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM; G) INSPECTION WRITTEN PRO- CEDURES HAVE NOT BEEN MADR PART OF THE SPCC PLAN AND THE INSPECTIONS RECORDS WERE NOT BEING KEPT BY THE FACILITY; AND H) SPCC PLAN DID NOT INDICATE A DESIGNATED PERSON RE- SPONSIBLE FOR SPILL PREVENTION. 4. RELIEF SOUGHT PURSUANT TO SECTION

Source

Authoritative
EPA ECHO
Machine
JSON-LD · Markdown